Providing known distribution patterns associated with specific measures and metrics

ABSTRACT

A computer receives one or more keywords input by a user to describe a metric or a test and identifies a first document that includes at least one of the keywords. The computer identifies, in the first document, a known distribution pattern and an associated metric or measure that relate to the one or more keywords. The computer makes an electronic record of the identified known distribution pattern and associated metric or measure.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to statistical analysis, andmore specifically to identifying a valid distribution pattern forresults of a type of test.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Different subject matter for a wide range of topics are analyzed andmeasured using various empirical studies and experimental tests thatproduce test results, which form distribution patterns when combinedwith the scales, metrics, and measures that were used. There are manywell-known discrete distribution patterns such as Weibull, Bernoulli,binomial, negative binomial, Poisson and geometric distributions. Thereare many well-known continuous distributions such as uniform, normal,exponential, gamma and beta distributions.

A distribution pattern for an object is created by graphing variationsin a characteristic of the object. For example, an x-axis can representthe mass of each object, and a y-axis can represent the number of theobjects with a given mass. Statistically, the resulting distributionpattern for the object is typically a bell curve where the objects withthe most common mass peak at the top of the bell.

Various types of scales are used to measure subject matter, includingnominal, ordinal, interval and ratio scales. Scales, such as a numericalscale which simply counts objects, a scale such as meters to measuredistance, a scale such as seconds to measure time, a scale such as bitrate to measure data transmission, a scale such as the Richter scale tomeasure earthquakes, etc. Metrics are measures of key attributes thatoften yield information about observed phenomena. Metrics provide abasis for empirical validation of theories and relationships betweenconcepts. There are different metrics for different subjects that aremeaningful and widely accepted, such as gas-mileage for an automobile orbit rate for a network, and should be re-used for subsequent analysisand comparison of objects within these subjects.

Statistics is the study of the collection, organization, analysis,interpretation, and presentation of data. The mathematical functionsused in statistics provide a means to analyze data and add meaning tothe measurements. Statistics can also be used for the planning of datacollection in terms of the design of surveys and experiments.Statisticians can improve data quality by developing specific experimentdesigns and survey samples. Statistics itself also provides tools forprediction and forecasting the use of data and statistical models.

In addition, data patterns may be modeled in a way that account forrandomness and uncertainty in the observations. These models can be usedto draw inferences about the process or population under study; apractice called inferential statistics. Inference is a vital element ofscientific advance, since it provides a way to draw conclusions fromdata that are subject to random variation. To prove the propositionsbeing investigated further, the conclusions are tested as well, as partof the scientific method. Descriptive statistics and analysis of the newdata tend to provide more information as to the truth of theproposition. Statistics is closely related to probability theory, withwhich it is often grouped. The difference is, roughly, that probabilitytheory starts from the given parameters of a total population to deduceprobabilities that pertain to samples. Statistical inference, however,moves in the opposite direction by inductively inferring from samples tothe parameters of a larger or total population.

Probability theory is the branch of mathematics concerned withprobability, the analysis of seemingly random phenomena. The centralobjects of probability theory are random variables, stochasticprocesses, and events: mathematical abstractions of non-deterministicevents or measured quantities that may either be single occurrences orevolve over time in an apparently random fashion.

The application of probability and statistics to analyze a data set canprovide valuable insight into observed phenomena. Knowledge of whichapproach to use when gathering data, which mathematical function toapply to the data set, or which distribution pattern best encompassesthe data is not always clear. Known solutions to this problem requirein-depth knowledge by an individual, who can then make a determinationas to which approach, mathematical function, or distribution pattern touse. However, there are currently a large number of possible approaches,mathematical functions, and distribution patterns to choose from and thenumber of options are continually increasing. As such, the detailedknowledge required to identify an appropriate measure, metric, ordistribution pattern for a given type of test or type of data is alsoincreasing. If a person knows what type of distribution pattern toexpect for test results, the person will know if test results obtainedby the person are reasonable and indicate that the test conducted by theperson was valid.

An object of the invention is to assist a person in determining adistribution pattern to expect for a test or metric.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention provide a system, method, andprogram product for determining accepted distribution patterns for agiven metric or measure. A computer receives one or more keywords inputby a user to describe the metric, or the test. The computer identifies afirst document that includes at least one of the one or more keywords.The computer identifies a first distribution pattern specified in thefirst document for the metric or the test. The computer makes anelectronic record that the first distribution pattern has previouslybeen exhibited for the metric or results of the test.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer system for identifying anexpected distribution pattern for a type of test, in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the steps of a distribution-patternidentification program of FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment ofthe present invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of internal and external components within thecomputing device of FIG. 1 in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detailwith reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating system 100 in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention. System 100 includes computingdevice 110. Distribution-pattern identification program 112 is installedin computing device 110. Document analysis rules 114, document tables116, and confidence analysis rules 118 are stored in computing device110 or associated storage. Storage device 120 includes distributiondocuments 125. As explained in more detail below, distribution-patternidentification program 112 searches the distribution documents toidentify one or more documents which match search criteria for a test ofa user and contain test results that exhibit expected distributionpatterns for the type of test.

In other embodiments, distribution documents 125, distribution-patternidentification program 112, document analysis rules 114, document tables116, and confidence analysis rules 118 may be stored externally andaccessed through network 130. Network 130 may be, for example, a localarea network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, or acombination of the two, and may include wired, wireless, fiber optic orany other connection known in the art. In general, network 130 may beany combination of connections and protocols that will supportcommunications between storage device 120, distribution documents 125,distribution-pattern identification program 112, document analysis rules114, document tables 116, and confidence analysis rules 118, andcomputing device 110 in accordance with a desired embodiment of thepresent invention.

Computing device 110 and storage device 120 may include internalhardware components 800 and external hardware components 900 as depictedand described in further detail with respect to FIG. 3.

In an exemplary embodiment, distribution-pattern identification program112 receives keyword(s) from a user to identify the type of test (suchas a measurement of a key metric) conducted or to be conducted by theuser. The keyword(s) can indicate a subject area, a type of attributemeasured, a type of test, a type of data produced by a test, a type ofmetric, a type of measurement used, a distribution pattern, or anycombination thereof. For example, if the user plans to test utilizationof memory in a computer, the key words can be “memory”, “utilization”and “distribution”. Distribution-pattern identification program 112 usesthe key words to search for documents that include the keyword(s). Next,distribution-pattern identification program 112 determines which of thedocuments specify a distribution pattern by searching the documents forany of a predetermined list of known distribution patterns? Next,distribution-pattern identification program 112 determines a confidencelevels for each of the distribution patterns identified in the searchresults. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, theconfidence level is based on the number of documents which correspond tothe key word search and exhibit the same distribution pattern. Then,computing device 110 displays the identified documents, the identifieddistribution patterns, and the determined confidence levels.

In an exemplary embodiment, document analysis rules 114 include text andsemantic analysis rules. These rules are applied to analyze thedocuments that are identified during searches, which are performed bydistribution-pattern identification program 112 using the keyword(s). Inthis embodiment, document analysis rules 114 also includes a dictionaryof keyword(s), herein denoted dictionary 115, that are used inconjunction with the text and semantic analysis rules during theanalysis of documents. This dictionary provides synonyms (often highlytechnical and esoteric) for user-specified search terms, anddistribution-pattern identification program 112 supplies the synonyms aswell as the user-specified search terms for the key word search to asearch engine which executes searches for the documents included indocument tables 116. Typically, dictionary 115 includes keyword(s) thatcorrespond to subject areas, types of attributes measured, types oftests, types of data produced by tests, types of metrics, type ofmeasures, and various known distribution patterns. The rules included indocument analysis rules 114 convert the text of documents into data foranalysis, via application of natural language processing (NLP). NLPincludes topics such as word and sentence tokenization, textclassification, sentiment analysis, spelling correction, informationextraction, parsing, meaning extraction, and question answering.However, in this embodiment, it is to be noted that through theapplication of NLP the meaning of text can be identified and relevantinformation extracted from the various analyzed documents. Documentanalysis rules 114 also include analytical rules to populate a databaseand an index, included in document tables 116, with the keywords thatare identified via the document analysis.

The database, included in document tables 116, includes tables thatorganize documents based on the results of text and semantic analysis,i.e. based on the inclusion of keyword(s). The documents are organizedby at least one of subject area, type of attribute measured, type oftest, type of data produced by a test, type of metric, the type ofmeasure used, distribution pattern, and determined confidence level. Inother words, the fields in the table associated with a given documentare populated based on the keyword(s) included in that document.

Distribution-pattern identification program 112 searches the index ofthe database, included in document tables 116, for matches to thekeyword(s) provided by the user. If there are no identified results orif the results have a low confidence level, then distribution-patternidentification program 112 searches distribution documents 125 forpreviously unidentified documents that include the keyword(s). The newlyidentified documents, included in distribution documents 125, are thenanalyzed using dictionary 115 and the text and semantic analysis rulesof document analysis rules 114. The analyzed documents are then includedas part of document tables 116.

In an exemplary embodiment, confidence analysis rules 118 are used bydistribution-pattern identification program 112 to determine confidencelevels for the distribution patterns identified in documents. Theserules can be very simple. For example, if 300 papers use a given metricand a Weibull distribution pattern, then the Weibull distributionpattern would have a proportionately high confidence level associatedwith that metric. In such a scenario, the document, metric, Weibulldistribution pattern, and associated confidence level are included aspart of document tables 116. Thus, a search, by distribution-patternidentification program 112, for the metric would generate a result thatincludes the Weibull distribution pattern and the high confidence level.

In an exemplary embodiment, distribution documents 125 includesdocuments such as research papers, peer reviewed journal articles, aswell as publications that include a variety of metrics and distributionpatterns. Most of these documents also include various keyword(s)included in dictionary 115. As described above, if distribution-patternidentification program 112 searches distribution documents 125 andidentifies a document containing a keyword of a search, then thatdocument is retrieved and analyzed before being added to document tables116.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating the function of distribution-patternidentification program 112, executing on computing device 110, fordetermining accepted distribution patterns for a result of a test, in anexemplary embodiment.

In this exemplary embodiment, in step 205, distribution-patternidentification program 112 receives a list of keyword(s) from a user.Distribution-pattern identification program 112 then searches the tablesincluded in document tables 116 for documents that include instances ofthe keyword(s) and its synonyms as found in dictionary 115, in step 210.

In decision step 215, distribution-pattern identification program 112determines if any documents are identified, i.e., if any documentscontain the keyword(s) or their synonyms. If documents are identified(decision step 215, yes branch), then distribution-patternidentification program 112 proceeds to step 230 to determine theconfidence levels for distribution patterns included in the identifieddocuments. If no documents are identified (decision step 215, nobranch), then distribution-pattern identification program 112 searchesdistribution documents 125 for previously unidentified documents thatcontain the keyword(s), in step 220.

In step 225, distribution-pattern identification program 112 accessesdictionary 115 and applies the text analysis rules and semantic analysisrules, included in document rules 114, to any documents that wereidentified in step 220. The now analyzed documents are included as partof document tables 116.

In step 230, distribution-pattern identification program 112 determinesconfidence levels for the distribution patterns of the documents thatinclude the keyword(s), which are included in document tables 116.Distribution-pattern identification program 112 determines, i.e.,calculates, the respective confidence levels for the distributionpatterns using the analysis rules included in confidence analysis rules118. Distribution-pattern identification program 112 updates thedocument tables, included in document tables 116, with the calculatedconfidence levels and displays the results of the search and thedetermined confidence level(s) to the user, in step 235. For example,the search results include 500 documents that all use a Poissondistribution for a given type of test data. The results of the searchwould indicate that the Poisson distribution was applied to the type ofdata, and a high confidence level reflecting its inclusion in the 500documents.

In some embodiments, the determination of whether any documents wereidentified during a search is based, in part, on a confidence levelthreshold. For example, there are five search results that include thekeyword(s) and respective confidence levels; all of which are below two.The threshold for acceptable confidence level is three. Therefore,distribution-pattern identification program 112 determines that nodocuments were identified.

In certain embodiments, distribution-pattern identification program 112includes a graphical user interface (GUI) that is used to conductsearches and display search results to the user.

In certain embodiments, document analysis rules 114 include rules toidentify references to other documents that include the keyword(s).Distribution-pattern identification program 112 uses these identifiedreferences to search for and retrieve the referenced documents.

In certain embodiments, distribution-pattern identification program 112includes programming to analyze documents to identify graphicalrepresentations of test results and metrics included in the documents,i.e. distribution-pattern identification program 112 includes imageanalysis programming to identify known distribution patterns.Distribution-pattern identification program 112 identifies a graphicalrepresentation in a document by analyzing the document for graphicaldata types, e.g., file attachments that end in .gif or areas of thedocument that include non text information such as axis, lines, values,and data point etc. In such an embodiment, the rules for documentanalysis to identify graphical representations are included as part ofdocument analysis rules 114. Document analysis rules 114 also includerules and programming to analyze the graphical content of such files. Insuch an embodiment, dictionary 115 includes a plurality of knowndistribution patterns and the guidelines that are used to identify eachtype of distribution pattern, i.e., definitions that are applied toidentify known distribution patterns. In such an embodiment, usingdocument analysis rules 114 and dictionary 115, distribution-patternidentification program 112 matches a known type of distribution patternto the graphical representation displayed in the document based on theshape of the graphical representation, and presents the distributionpattern to the user. For example, if the graphical pattern shown in agraph in the document has the shape of a bell curve,distribution-pattern identification program 112 applies documentanalysis rules 114 and dictionary 115 and identifies that the graphicalpattern has a symmetrical shape with a single apex and two termini thatapproach zero. Based on the guidelines that are used to identify eachtype of distribution pattern, included in dictionary 115,distribution-pattern identification program 112 identifies andclassifies the graphical pattern as a Gaussian distribution. As anotherexample, distribution-pattern identification program 112 identifies afile attachment that end in .gif. Distribution-pattern identificationprogram 112 opens the file using an appropriate reader and then analysesthe resulting graphical pattern, using document analysis rules 114 anddictionary 115, and identifies a matching known distribution pattern.

In certain embodiments, distribution-pattern identification program 112includes programming to extract and convert parts of electronicdocuments and file attachments. For example, a document is in portabledocument format (PDF) and includes an embedded image in a format thatcan not be analyzed using document analysis rules 114 and dictionary115. Distribution-pattern identification program 112 extracts theembedded image and converts the image into a .gif format, which can beanalyzed using document analysis rules 114 and dictionary 115.Distribution-pattern identification program 112 can thus identify adistribution pattern included in a document even though that documentdoes not include the name of the distribution pattern or keywords thatidentify that distribution pattern.

Distribution-pattern identification program 112 can also apply textanalytics to the contents within such a document and determine aconfidence level for that distribution pattern, i.e., a confidence levelthat indicates how well the given scale or metric follows a certaindistribution pattern. This confidence level can be based on such factorsas a) number of published documents that establish the relationshipbetween a given scale, metric or measure and a certain distributionpattern, b) the reputation of the journals where these papers werepublished, c) a characteristic of the journal articles, e.g., length, d)duration or time period associated with these publications thatestablish the scale-distribution relationship, i.e., the longer theduration the higher the confidence level for the scale-distributionrelationship. For example, a document includes data, in a graphicalrepresentation, for a population distribution of a species of pink birdin a given area. Distribution-pattern identification program 112 appliesgraphical analysis programming and identifies the distribution asmatching a clumped distribution pattern. Therefore, distribution-patternidentification program 112 adds the document to document tables 116 andassociates the entry with the following keywords: clumped distributionpattern, pink bird, and population distribution.

Computing device 110 includes a set of internal components 800 a andexternal components 900 a, illustrated in FIG. 3. Storage device 120includes a set of internal components 800 b and external components 900b, illustrated in FIG. 3. Each of the sets of internal components 800a,b includes one or more processors 820, one or more computer-readableRAMs 822 and one or more computer-readable ROMs 824 on one or more buses826, one or more operating systems 828 and one or more computer-readabletangible storage devices 830. The one or more operating systems 828 anddistribution documents 125, distribution-pattern identification program112, document analysis rules 114, document tables 116, and confidenceanalysis rules 118 are stored on one or more of the respectivecomputer-readable storage devices 830 for execution by one or more ofthe respective processors 820 via one or more of the respective RAMs 822(which typically include cache memory). In the illustrated embodiment,each of the computer-readable storage devices 830 is a magnetic diskstorage device of an internal hard drive. Alternatively, each of thecomputer-readable storage devices 830 is a semiconductor storage devicesuch as ROM 824, EPROM, flash memory or any other computer-readablestorage device that can store but does not transmit a computer programand digital information.

Each set of internal components 800 a,b also includes a R/W drive orinterface 832 to read from and write to one or more portablecomputer-readable storage devices 936 that can store but do not transmita computer program, such as a CD-ROM, DVD, memory stick, magnetic tape,magnetic disk, optical disk or semiconductor storage device.Distribution documents 125, distribution-pattern identification program112, document analysis rules 114, document tables 116, and confidenceanalysis rules 118 can be stored on one or more of the respectiveportable computer-readable storage devices 936, read via the respectiveR/W drive or interface 832 and loaded into the respective hard drive orsemiconductor storage device 830. The term “computer-readable storagedevice” does not encompass signal propagation media such as coppercables, optical fibers and wireless transmission media.

Each set of internal components 800 a,b also includes a network adapteror interface 836 such as a TCP/IP adapter card or wireless communicationadapter (such as a 4G wireless communication adapter using OFDMAtechnology). Distribution documents 125, distribution-patternidentification program 112, document analysis rules 114, document tables116, and confidence analysis rules 118 can be downloaded to therespective computing/processing devices from an external computer orexternal storage device via a network (for example, the Internet, alocal area network or other, wide area network or wireless network) andnetwork adapter or interface 836. From the network adapter or interface836, the programs are loaded into the respective hard drive orsemiconductor storage device 830. The network may comprise copper wires,optical fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches,gateway computers and/or edge servers.

Each of the sets of external components 900 a,b includes a displayscreen 920, a keyboard or keypad 930, and a computer mouse or touchpad934. Each of the sets of internal components 800 a,b also includesdevice drivers 840 to interface to display screen 920 for imaging, tokeyboard or keypad 930, to computer mouse or touchpad 940, and/or to adisplay screen for pressure sensing of alphanumeric character entry anduser selections. The device drivers 840, R/W drive or interface 832 andnetwork adapter or interface 836 comprise hardware and software (storedin storage device 830 and/or ROM 824).

The programs can be written in various programming languages (such asJava®, C+) including low-level, high-level, object-oriented or nonobject-oriented languages. Alternatively, the functions of the programscan be implemented in whole or in part by computer circuits and otherhardware (not shown).

Based on the foregoing, a computer system, a method, and a programproduct have been disclosed for determining a distribution patternpreviously exhibited for a metric or results of a test. However,numerous modifications and substitutions can be made without deviatingfrom the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the presentinvention has been disclosed by way of example and not limitation.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for determining a distribution patternpreviously exhibited for a metric or a test, the method comprising: acomputer receiving one or more keywords input by a user to describe themetric, or the test; the computer identifying a first document thatincludes at least one of the one or more keywords; the computeridentifying a first distribution pattern specified in the first documentfor the metric or the test; and the computer making an electronic recordthat the first distribution pattern has previously been exhibited forthe metric or the test.
 2. The method of claim 1, the method furthercomprising the step of: the computer determining and making anelectronic record of a confidence level of the first distributionpattern.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of the computerdetermining and making an electronic record of a confidence level of thefirst distribution pattern further comprises: the computer identifyingother documents that include the one or more key words and determinesthe confidence level of the first distribution pattern based in part ona number of the documents that specify the first distribution pattern.4. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more keywords relate to atleast one of the metric, a measure, a scale, a measure, a result of thetest, a performance indicator, a method of empirical observation orexperiment, a type of study, a type of data, a type of test thatgenerated the type of data, a subject that was or will be measured, acategory that includes the subject, a scale, a unit of measure, acategory that includes the type of test, and a condition that was orwill be present during execution of the type of test.
 5. The method ofclaim 1 further comprising the step of: the computer searching aknowledge repository for one or more known distribution patterns thatare one or both of a) related to the one or more keywords, and b) is aresult of an empirical observation or experiment that is identified bythe one or more keywords.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein theidentified first document is included in the knowledge repository whichincludes one or more publications and scholarly articles that areaccessible via at least one of the internet or an intranet.
 7. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: the computeridentifying a second document that is referenced by the first document,wherein the second document includes a distribution pattern that isrelated to the one or more keywords; and the computer identifying andmaking an electronic record of the known distribution pattern and anassociated metric or measure that is included in the second document. 8.The method of claim 7, further comprising the steps of: the computerdetermining a confidence level for the identified known distributionpattern included in the second document, and the computer making anelectronic record of the determined confidence level for the identifiedknown distribution pattern included in the second document.
 9. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising the step of: the computeridentifying two or more known distribution patterns that are closelyrelated to one another, wherein the two or more known distributionpatterns include at least one element selected from the group consistingof a type of data, a type of test, a category that includes thedistribution pattern, a spatial arrangement of data within thedistribution pattern, a shape associated with the distribution pattern,and an amount of measured data that is included by the distributionpattern.
 10. The method of claim 5, wherein the first document isincluded in the knowledge repository which organizes documents based, atleast in part, on keywords and known distribution patterns respectivelyincluded in those documents.
 11. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising the steps of: the computer identifying in the first documenta graphical representation of the metric or a result of the test; andthe computer identifying a distribution pattern that matches thegraphical representation.
 12. A computer program product for determininga distribution pattern previously exhibited for a metric or a test, thecomputer program product comprising: one or more computer-readablestorage media and program instructions stored on the one or morecomputer-readable storage media, the program instructions comprising:program instructions to receive one or more keywords input by a user todescribe the metric, or the test; program instructions to identify afirst document that includes at least one of the one or more keywords;program instructions to identify a first distribution pattern specifiedin the first document for the metric or the test; and programinstructions to make an electronic record that the first distributionpattern has previously been exhibited for the metric or the test. 13.The computer program product of claim 12, the program instructionsfurther comprising: program instructions to determine and make anelectronic record of a confidence level of the first distributionpattern.
 14. The computer program product of claim 13, wherein theprogram instructions to determine and make an electronic record of aconfidence level of the first distribution pattern further comprises:program instructions to identify other documents that include the one ormore key words and determines the confidence level of the firstdistribution pattern based in part on a number of the documents thatspecify the first distribution pattern.
 15. The computer program productof claim 12, wherein the one or more keywords relate to at least one ofthe metric, a measure, a scale, a measure, a result of the test, aperformance indicator, a method of empirical observation or experiment,a type of study, a type of data, a type of test that generated the typeof data, a subject that was or will be measured, a category thatincludes the subject, a scale, a unit of measure, a category thatincludes the type of test, and a condition that was or will be presentduring execution of the type of test.
 16. The computer program productof claim 12, the program instructions further comprising: programinstructions to search a knowledge repository for one or more knowndistribution patterns that are one or both of a) related to the one ormore keywords, and b) is a result of an empirical observation orexperiment that is identified by the one or more keywords.
 17. Thecomputer program product of claim 12, the program instructions furthercomprising: program instructions to identify a second document that isreferenced by the first document, wherein the second document includes adistribution pattern that is related to the one or more keywords; andprogram instructions to identify and make an electronic record of theknown distribution pattern and an associated metric or measure that isincluded in the second document.
 18. The computer program product ofclaim 17, the program instructions further comprising: programinstructions to determine a confidence level for the identified knowndistribution pattern included in the second document, and programinstructions to make an electronic record of the determined confidencelevel for the identified known distribution pattern included in thesecond document.
 19. The computer program product of claim 12, theprogram instructions further comprising: program instructions toidentify two or more known distribution patterns that are closelyrelated to one another, wherein the two or more known distributionpatterns include at least one element selected from the group consistingof a type of data, a type of test, a category that includes thedistribution pattern, a spatial arrangement of data within thedistribution pattern, a shape associated with the distribution pattern,and an amount of measured data that is included by the distributionpattern.
 20. The computer program product of claim 12, the programinstructions further comprising: program instructions to identify in thefirst document a graphical representation of the metric or a result ofthe test; and program instructions to identify a distribution patternthat matches the graphical representation.